eMusic's popularity has done a great deal for the credibility of the mp3 as a distribution format, and Amazon's new entry should do still more but we've still got a long way to go. It's encouraging to see Mp3 positive language in a publication like Forbes but, we need a full court press on the labels to make 2007 the year of the Mp3. Music fans and musicians need to step up and demand that the majors give us music in the format we want.
Mp3 format as major label cure
eMusic's popularity has done a great deal for the credibility of the mp3 as a distribution format, and Amazon's new entry should do still more but we've still got a long way to go. It's encouraging to see Mp3 positive language in a publication like Forbes but, we need a full court press on the labels to make 2007 the year of the Mp3. Music fans and musicians need to step up and demand that the majors give us music in the format we want.
Reader Comments
(Page 1)2. To me the most interesting piece in the Forbes article was Kohn's view on the future of the music experience as he says:
"I think the future lies in being able to have wireless access to every record ever recorded on a device that can hold everything you could possibly need with enough memory. So if I want to play it on any speaker I'm near, all I have to do is [wirelessly] transmit to the speaker system and I'm done."
That's so beautiful. But will that ever be reality?
3. Why not sell it in lossless FLAC format?
Converters to MP3 at the user's preferred bitrate would make FLAC even more preferable to MP3, i.e. download the high fidelity FLAC file and reproduce as many copies at any bitrate that you prefer dependent upon listening environment, e.g. car vs street vs home.
Why distribute an inferior product? Distribute the best product, and let the punter trade off size vs quality.
Or am I missing something?
Posted at 8:36AM on Jan 2nd 2007 by Crosbie Fitch
4. I want better sound than MP3 offers. I want better sound than a CD offers. Why are we lowering the standard all the time? Things should get better, not worse.
Unfortunately, people want cheaper, not better. That's why MP3 won't work as a download format, it would just streamline the process of putting unprotected files up for sharing, rather than suddenly make everyone happy they can pay for them. Why would a label/distributor want that? I don't know the answer, but it may be too late for this kind of viable solution. People are too fed up with the big labels and it bleeds into indie sales as well.













1. I hate to admit this but I don't have the contact info for any of the execs at the recording labels. If I did I would have told them about wanting MP3s a long time ago.
Posted at 5:09PM on Dec 29th 2006 by D