This, I like. Sites that offer free music and promises of 100-percent legality are under examination by the Center for Democracy and Technology, which is requesting action from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). We're not talking about file-sharing sites, but sleazy operations that sell P2P software easily available free of charge elsewhere, and reassurance of safety. The complaint centers on the misleading claims of legality, but that's not the most heinous problem in my mind. More scandalous is the selling of pointless software and the outright deluding of customers. Some would say that file-sharing companies like KaZaA and Grokster do exactly the same thing—indeed, that sort of thinking lies behind the temporarily defunct INDUCE Act, which claims that file-sharing companies induce innocent individuals into the realms of pornography and unauthorized music. But there is a crucial difference between offering software which can be used for both legal and illegal activities, and selling software which represents a lie with every transaction.













1. Free Music SHOULD be illegal & removed forever from the Internet. I only hope that they come up with software, (which I beleive is now in the process) that will prevent Music moochers & flakey Artists from getting & giving away free, quote "Music". This "free" mentality is unprofitable & hurtful to Professional Artists who are trying to make a living off their hard earned costly works. "Who ever gives anything away for free"?
Posted at 5:58AM on Dec 19th 2005 by W. Ervine